Categories
Hospitals & Healthcare Leadership Opinion

New Podcast: World’s Mayor Interview

The problem: At the end of Spielberg’s “Life on Our Planet” Netflix series, Morgan Freeman said: “Our ingenuity has taken us further than we could ever have imagined, and our story is now written on the surface of the Earth. What was once wild has been tamed or lost.

We’re too successful for our own good and for that of the planet… and we are now causing the next mass extinction.” What’s the alternative? Humanity is at a moment of truth where the very purpose of our existence and the fate of our species is being threatened by global problems of our own making. A spiritual and philosophical reboot is in order. We must look at what we’ve done, where we are now, and what humanity must do to stave off the sixth extinction, to plan, and implement the Second Human Evolution.

We can do this thing; humankind will endure. Following his Care for Peace Foundation’s creation of a prototype Community Development and Health Center in Myanmar (formerly “Burma”), Jeffrey Charles Hardy wrote a book TO CARE FOR PEACE – A GLOBAL MANDATE TO SECURE THE SECOND HUMAN EVOLUTION IN PERPETUITY.

In the book, Hardy concludes that the First Human Evolution that began in Africa some 2.5 million years ago is over, and the only way to avoid the ultimate demise of humanity through “killing for peace” is to flip the narrative and institute a global process to “care for peace.” The First Human Evolution—a macro-sociological epoch—ended sometime during the mid-60s when it became very clear that humanity had conquered nature, and we could destroy the entire planet and every living thing on it through mutually assured destruction.

The Second Human Evolution has not even begun yet. The Second Human Evolution will only begin after a global planning process has occurred. And we are doing whatever we need to be good stewards of our fragile planet. We are now stuck in the Suspended Human Evolution. The process is the solution: The Suspended Human Evolution will only end after we have dealt forthrightly with the global problems that are getting worse by the hour, including overpopulation, over-consumption, over-militarization, and over-burdening the limited resources of our planet.

Categories
Opinion

The Day Democracy Died

Trump’s vicious and violent breach of democracy, the rule of law and human decency goes far and wide—worldwide.

On February 1st—a mere 26 days after the January 6th insurrection on the American Capital—The military coup in Myanmar became the most recent example of Trump’s revolting influence on would-be dictators everywhere.

While I listen to the experts and pundits explain what just happened in Myanmar, they don’t explain the reason why, after the military generals watched Trump on their high-definition televisions that the idea they could do the same in their own country wasn’t much of a reach.

The details of the forceful takeover have been widely reported, but the act and the timing of the coup couldn’t have been more specious.

I suspect that the military generals had been watching the US election and its horrific aftermath on their high-def televisions.

The idea that the generals could use Trump’s perverted rule book to re-take their own country after a decade of democratic rule wasn’t much of a reach.

For the last decade, Care for Peace, our Marin-based global health foundation has been working closely with Aung San Suu Kyi’s government officials and the Ministry of Health to build a prototype community development and health center in “deep rural” Myanmar, so it isn’t difficult for me imagine what was going on in the Myanmar generals’ heads as they watched the Trump circus:

They watched Trump blatantly lie that he had won the election by a landslide when everybody knows he hadn’t.

They watched Trump as he railed against the American Democratic Party and anyone that he didn’t agree with, and then I imagine the generals saw parallels with how they thought about Aung San Suu Kyi’s National League for Democracy Party in Myanmar.

And they watched how Trump instigated insurrection, set his thugs on the Capital leaving 5 dead, many injured and our collective fear that the hallowed halls of our democracy had been violated.

“Hey! If Trump can do it, so can I!” the Commander-in-Chief Min Aung Hlaing might have said.

“It was an inside job led by the US President and his own army!” said another general.

“We have our own army! We are on the inside! We can do that too!” said yet another.

“Here’s our window of opportunity!” they all said together.

During the previous decade, Aung San Suu Kyi had taken her country out of the burning embers of the previous Military dictatorship to build a thriving democracy and a burgeoning free-market economy.

But then in 2017, Aung San Suu Kyi’s shining star went into free fall when a million Rohingya Muslims escaped her country’s persecution and trekked perilously across the border to safety in Bangladesh.

At the same time America’s shining star had already been in a two-year free fall under Trump’s deranged attack on democracy, on the rule of law and at anyone he didn’t like including our international allies.

Less than a month after the insurrection, the Myanmar military saw their opportunity.

“Now!” they said.

They declared martial law, arrested Aung San Suu Kyi and then rounded up anyone who might seem a threat to the coup.

They succeeded in taking over the government where Trump’s troops failed to take over ours.

While there is great hope that under President Biden’s leadership we can reconstruct all that Trump left behind during his four-year ‘reign of error’, there is still great cause to worry.

Trump’s attack on the U.S. Constitution and on the Democratic Party was an attack on the very heart of democracy that has now become threatened not only here at home but also within the hearts of hundreds of millions of people worldwide who hope with us that America so conceived and so dedicated to liberty, freedom and the rule of law, will long endure.

Trump’s vicious and violent breach on our democracy occurred on January 6th. Myanmar’s military’s vicious and violent breach occurred only 30 days after ours. Democracy died in Myanmar on February 1st.

I just hope that the day democracy died in Myanmar wasn’t a harbinger of a day when democracy dies in America.

Categories
Community Opinion

Coronavirus reality show would make victims real for all of us

Published by Marin Independent Journal

The coronavirus pandemic should make us very frightened right now. Why don’t we understand that yet?

The COVID-19 cases and deaths just keep piling up, and I think I know at least one of the reasons. Most of us haven’t seen the reality of what happens to the infected victims up close and personal.

Most of us have neither known nor observed an infected person, nor have we seen anyone who tests positive for the dreaded COVID-19 on television.

Anyone testing positive is immediately self-isolated until they either get better or they disappear into a hospital and an uncertain fate.

The infected become as invisible as the dreaded virus itself.

Maybe we would be scared enough to change our behaviors if we watched an on-going COVID-19 “reality show” where television news and social video media follow several victims as the virus gets a grip and fights a life-and-death battle with its host.

Most all I see on TV are second- and third-hand stories about people who have contracted COVID-19.

The fact that we haven’t witnessed the horror might be the reason there are so many naysayers, “plan-demic” conspirators, and mask-free political rally attendees standing shoulder-to-shoulder in solid blocks of denial.

We need to watch people as they progress through the viral gauntlet from the moment they test positive.

We need to hear them share their day-to-day thoughts and fears as the virus takes over their lives.

As any fan of reality shows like “Lost,” “Survivor” or “Deadliest Catch” knows, we would be glued to the “reality news” because it’s now and we’re in it.

We would discuss the participants during our Zoom meetings or during our socially distanced mask meetings.

We would feel the pain as we worry and watch with white knuckles as the reality show participants get better or worse.

We would wonder who might pull through, if the affected mother will be able to deliver her baby, or, perhaps, how those who we helped pull through with our prayers are faring a few weeks later.

Some of our new victim friends will only have flu-like symptoms; some will get sicker.

Some will get so sick they will disappear into a hospital. But, this time, it will be with a gowned film crew in tow.

We will watch some of them as they are sedated into a coma before being intubated on a ventilator; some will live and never be the same again, and some will die.

We’ll see them all at different stages of illness, and we’ll discuss each COVID-19 victim with our friends, hoping that our favorite character gets off the ventilator soon, or that another character didn’t accidentally transfer the virus to her family and friends at her wedding before she was tested positive.

We relate to television personalities, especially to real people who are like us.

We need to bring the victims into the forefront of our viewing, into our discussions and into our collective psyche because seeing is believing, perception is reality and neither believing nor perception will occur until and unless it is right here in front of our eyes.

Perhaps it would be better to watch a COVID-19 reality show on the news, so that we don’t have to watch or experience its dreaded effects on our loved ones here at home.

Then many of those who aren’t wearing masks, washing their hands and socially distancing will finally get scared to death and change their lives accordingly.

The COVID-19 reality show is long overdue.

Categories
Hospitals & Healthcare Opinion

The Heart of Care for Peace

For the last 40-plus years I have dedicated my life to planning healthcare facilities in the USA and in other countries.  

Since February, 2010 I have dedicated my mission-based career to helping the people who live in rural Myanmar take charge and build their own their own healthcare services and facilities.

Myanmar is just coming out of the their political isolation from the rest of the world in an effort to build a lasting democracy and achieve peace among the people and the international community.

I do not believe that the war-based word “peace” can ever be attained through killing.  I believe that peace can only be attained through caring.

The people of Myanmar deserve peace.  

The charge of the Care for Peace non-profit organization is to help them attain peace through caring.

While the idea of a company named “Care for Peace” began in Nigeria in 2008 where it was evident the African country needed both, it was only the opportunity presented by U Hla Kyi, Regional Director and Founder of Care for Peace – Myanmar when the name was affixed to the title and purpose of an organization.  

This blog will be a place for me to share the goings-on of Care for Peace: our activities in Myanmar; our fundraising efforts here in the USA, in Myanmar and internationally; our amazing partners in Myanmar; and to witness the evolution of an opportunity to help others build their own healthcare systems, services and facilities by taking advantage of all that we have learned – the successes, failures and near-misses – in the spirit of caring… for peace.

Peace is the highest accomplishment of the human spirit. It must be.

We wish for peace.

“Give peace a chance” – John Lennon’s song of hope for mankind

We want peace for others

“Peace be with you” – a blessing

“Go in peace” –  comfort words to a traveler

We give the most coveted award in the world for peace:

The Nobel Peace Prize – the highest medal of honor bestowed on an individual or group

And we wish the dead to continue living in peace.

“Rest in peace” – the most oft-used letters on tombstones everywhere

Caring is what makes the process of attaining peace worthwhile. It must be.

Caring is the deliberate act of attending to your duty with a desire to do well and to secure the best results of your actions.

Care is when you put your heart, soul, expertise and attention into your hands.

Caring requires one to simultaneously focus on the current conditions and the desired outcomes of your actions.

Caring is and end of itself.

Satisfaction of accomplishing and accomplishment is the result of having been careful.

To care for peace is to choose the process of caring as the method by which you will attain living and lasting peace. It must be.

The name says it all:  

“Care for peace” is a directive:  

Care with your heart, head and hands

“Care for peace” is a roadmap:

Through “care” you can attain “peace”

“Care for peace” is the starting point:

If you “care” you can attain “peace”

“Care for peace” is the route: 

The path to “peace” is through “caring”

And “care for peace” is the destination:

       If you “care” about “peace” then “caring” will get you there.

       When you reach “peace” through “care” you have arrived at your destination

“Care for peace” on a personal level is then converted to what Care for Peace means on an organizational level which begins by identifying who we are caring for: the children of Myanmar.

Categories
Community

Our coronavirus care chain is missing the neighborhood link

Published by Marin Independent Journal.

The missing link in the COVID-19 care chain is rapidly expanding and the size of a black hole.

The “care chain” is the entire strand of public health services, which includes the World Health Organization and Center for Disease Control and Prevention, as well as national, state and county health services.

While we stock up on toilet paper, cans of tuna and Nutella because we don’t trust the supply chain, the care chain can’t be trusted either. It is missing that critical link at the neighborhood level, aka the N Level.

Taiwan has had recent success in stopping the spread of coronavirus. Its seamless national public health system includes N Level links that are, reportedly, one of the many reasons why the country has the lowest number of coronavirus cases and deaths of any country in the world.

According to the Economist magazine, “Taiwan’s system of neighborhood (managers) … has helped enforce quarantines and deliver food to those who cannot go out to get it.”

Taiwan Vice President Chen Chien-jen, an epidemiologist and former health minister, is the “czar” of the Central Epidemic Command Center.

The small-is-beautiful reasoning behind these N Level centers for disease control and prevention is that neighborhood-based surveillance and management works better and faster in a tight community setting.

As Taiwan shows us, individuals can be identified and quarantined before the nasty virus reaches anyone in the neighborhood cluster.

It’s easier to put out a small fire in a neighborhood than wait until it becomes an uncontrollable, national conflagration.

If the virus breaches the local societal wall, victims can be carefully isolated and monitored without leaving the confines of the neighborhood.

Here in the United States, neither the federal government nor the state or county governments have the means to provide the type of individualized care that this epidemic requires, but they can help draw attention to the great need for N Level epidemic surveillance and management.

How do we definie a neighborhood? If I stand on the flat roof of my house; the 50-odd homes that I can see are my N Level cluster.

Folks living in apartments or condos would consider their neighbors to be everyone in the building or complex.

The problem I have in my neighborhood is that I really don’t know my neighbors at all, much less how I would help them in case of an emergency, so where would I begin as an individual cloistered in my home office for the duration?

This is where Marin County supervisors need to be working in tandem with public and private health and security services.

Our county officials need to rapidly organize, establish an epidemic management command center and commission a czar.

Job No. 1: Identify and develop pilot N Level community projects.

Once tested in the field, the czar would need to establish policies and procedures that would soon be extended to other N Level neighborhoods.

In order to catch up with the type of technological system that Taiwan has already implemented, we should identify similar, national N Level mobile phone applications that will fit the need for all participants within any given N Level cluster.

Oversight should be from a national coronavirus hub, and be managed by N Level czars whose sole duty is to communicate general and specific information, to monitor preventive, curative and household support activities and to help each neighbor as needed.

Since Taiwan already has the system and the experience for N-level management, perhaps we should invite Vice President Chen Chien-jen to advise us at all levels of organization, management and implementation.

But we need to get started now.

Every day tens of thousands of people are getting the virus, thousands are dying and millions are grieving, many are jobless and many more just worried.

The missing link is still missing — glaringly so.

The sooner we get started, the sooner we will create the most vital link in the care chain that includes our families, friends, you and me at the neighborhood level.

Categories
Community Opinion

It’s time to develop community-based disaster control and prevention in Marin

The highest levels of the US Government and international experts address the coronavirus epidemic that is already creeping into Marin.

Marin has an unprecedented opportunity to show the rest of the country how to get started with a community-based approach to disaster preparedness and response that would not only serve our current needs, but would establish working communication and activation mechanisms that could be used for other situations in the future.

The federal approach just might work, but isn’t there something we can do at the Marin community, neighborhood level to help each other during this global crisis?

I think there is definitely something we can do, and we wouldn’t need to re-invent the wheel.

For example, knowing that “The Big One” earthquake was imminent, several homeowners living along the Hayward Fault in the Berkeley Hills established a shining example of a well-defined Disaster Preparedness and Response System (DPRS).

Homeowners convened a “neighborhood cluster” of individuals and families to define and refine a DPRS plan, and then disseminate communications to all members.

If an earthquake hits, the Hayward neighborhood cluster is prepared.  

Background: I am a 43-year veteran, patient-focused healthcare management and facility planning and design specialist.

I am well versed in the process called “failure avoidance” that I have used when planning a new healthcare facility in the USA, or recently in a “deep rural” village in Myanmar where our nonprofit organization built a prototype, tele-connected Community Development and Health Center.

Also, following the Katrina hurricane devastation of New Orleans, I presented “The Graded Approach to Disaster Management” at a healthcare symposium.

Marin needs both failure avoidance and a graded approach to the emerging CVE (a.k.a. Coronavirus Epidemic.)

The graded approach to disaster management is a process that establishes worst case scenarios of any imaginable, predictable or probable calamity that may befall a given community, and then proceeds to plan, design and build educational, preventive and responsive systems accordingly.

However, the onslaught of CVE is unlike a hurricane that can be visibly seen before its arrival, nor is it like “The Big One” earthquake where long-range building, infrastructure and communication systems have already been established.

Marin has very little time to establish a Disaster Preparedness and Response System, and the time we do have must be just short of doing what we would do if CVE had already struck close to home…but then it already has.

While it is apparent that CVE is being addressed at all levels of government, I suggest rapid deployment of a graded approach to this deadly killer.

Before the approach begins, we need to accept the fact that all the Federal, State and even regional decrees and support will not take the place of community consciousness, organization and management, but we would need to ensure communication, scheduling and logistics connections at the onset of the community-based process.

While the CVE disaster itself is different, the Hayward Fault preparation process is one of many that exist to guide our way.

Marin should initially identify small-to-medium “neighborhood clusters” that exist within a natural geographic proximity, and would organize and implement preparatory programs with the assistance of Marin’s government, healthcare and security agencies.

For example, my wife and I live in what NextDoor.com calls “Marin Highlands”, an area including 11,000 neighbors; this large grouping would need to be segmented into several smaller manageable clusters for development into do-able, Hayward Fault-style communication and disaster management hubs.

The charge within each cluster would be to become educated on everything that has to do with the virus, how it begins, how to prevent its spread, where global, national and regional breakouts have occurred and are occurring, how to assist a family member or cluster member who may have come in contact with a “carrier” of the virus, how to communicate current status, and then what to do within the community to avoid the spread while an infected member is treated outside the cluster.

While the initial “grade” in disaster management is to develop the clusters, the second and third grades, namely suspected and confirmed carrier isolation and treatment, would be in the expert hands of Marin’s Health and Human Services working in tandem with the Marin Supervisors, City Mangers, public and private healthcare providers, hospitals and clinics and the Sheriff’s office, among others.

If not already been established, a Marin CVE Czar would need to sketch out potential neighborhood clusters, and then immediately establish one small, pilot cluster to inaugurate the process and help fine-tune as we go along.

To interface with the pilot cluster, the CVE Czar would need to commission a three-person team comprised of a Marin government employee, a qualified medical practitioner, and a member of our security services.

Once the pilot cluster gets going, other clusters could be inaugurated in overlapping parallel steps to avoid the entire process taking longer than a month.

Unlike communist China where General Secretary Xi Jinping can decree quarantine of 17 million people and the creation of billion-dollar pop-up hospitals overnight, America is largely unprepared to institute an immediate all-hands-on-deck national response to what is tantamount to a blitzkrieg upon our own soil, or to a 9/11 terrorist attack on our own people.

No, we are going to face the problem the American Way that might take a bit more time to set up a national response system.

In the meantime, there’s the Marin Way that could show how rapidly well-honed county government and healthcare system responds to the CVE disaster…now!

Categories
Opinion

Allow secret ballots, see what government can get done

A “what if” idea recently popped into my head while chaperoning my granddaughter’s 4th grade Rancho Novato field trip to the California State Capital.

Prior to the trip I had been wondering how our State and Federal Congressional representatives might do their jobs unencumbered by big money donors and political action committees that circumvent the will of the people, compromise our trust in the democratic process, and make us feel our vote has little to no value.

As I sat in the upstairs gallery of the State Assembly and looked down at the 80 representatives’ desks I noticed that on the upper right corner of each of their desks were three little buttons for voting their decision on each ballot.

Green: Yea.  Red: Nay.  Yellow: Abstain.

Our Capital guide told us that, “When a button is pressed it immediately flashes on the big LED display screen for all to see…” 

“For all to see?” I wondered, “Don’t you mean, ‘for all the big moneyed interests who donate funds to support campaigns, junkets and livelihoods?’” 

That’s when the “what if?” popped into my head: 

What if representatives in both houses of Congress voted on all bills by secret ballot, just like you and me?

I checked out Wikipedia when I got home: “The secret ballot is a voting method in which a voter’s choices in an election or a referendum is anonymous, forestalling attempts to influence the voter by intimidation, blackmailing, and potential vote buying. 

“The system is one means of achieving the goal of political privacy.”

Wouldn’t secret balloting give our representatives the privacy they need instead of feeling or being obligated to vote for whatever they had promised to donor organizations, political action committees, corporations, private patrons or lobbyists?

What would happen if these donors were no longer able to peek under the booth to observe and dictate how their legislators voted?

At the very least there would be a tectonic shift in how campaigns are financed when money can no longer buy votes.

Why would any donor want to be financially involved if there were no way to hold their representative’s feet to the fire?

How could a representative be accountable if they had promised to vote one way, but in the confines of their own conscience and a secret ballot booth they could vote the opposite?

Of course representatives who are heavily beholden to individual moneyed donors might suddenly find themselves abandoned by their benefactors.

Current assumptions regarding the reportedly strong influence of the NRA and other prominent special interest lobbies that seem to have an inordinate amount of power over their representatives would be put to the test. 

Would final tallies on, say, basic women’s right to their own bodies, be different than the era we might call “before secret ballot”?

On a more positive note, with our reps no longer beholden to monied interests, the issues, not the highest bidder, would be the major factor in any debate.

An example: Instead of watching big pharma and health insurance lobbies whittle away at any national health plan, similar to Canadian, British and other first-world nations, put up a comprehensive National Health Service (NHS), a.k.a. “Universal Health” bill that covers everyone in the United States.

Then vote on it via secret ballot.

Another example: Instead of today’s process of letting full-time employers get away with hiring short-term employees so that they don’t have to pay for benefits, and letting employers hire only contract workers, immediately open up a separate “NHS Savings Account” (through secret ballot) wherein we set aside 1 penny for every dollar paid to any full- or part-time worker.

Then vote on it via secret ballot.

At the end of the debate year we will have saved over $3 billion that would go towards the development a National Health Service that has eluded intelligent debate due to the dictates of powerful interests.

Finally: Draft a strong gun-control bill, a women’s rights bill and other societally conscious bills that customarily get axed by bought-and-paid-for representatives.

Then vote on them via secret ballot.

Something like this will never see the light of day if healthcare special interests are still wielding their power with an estimated $4 billion annual buy-a-vote funds.

Looking at the evolution of the indentured voter problem, it seems that our State and Federal Congresses are caught up in a systemic problem regarding campaign finance that was unforeseen by our forefathers.

So Instead of trying to eliminate the likes of Citizens United, billionaire donors and lobby firms that all have a “neo” agenda in one form or another, “what if” we modify the Congressional Rules of Order that would protect the integrity of congressional balloting through secret balloting.

Who knows?  Maybe we can finally ditch John Adams’ greatest fear – the polarized two-party system in favor of the alternative: an American system.

Where to start?

The process is the solution.

It should begin with secret ballot voting for one and all.

Categories
Hospitals & Healthcare

Model to promote peace through health, faces struggle

Care for peace: It was a humble quid-pro-quo idea that couldn’t fail … or could it?

The idea was that our Marin-based nonprofit, aptly named Care for Peace, would help the underserved villagers in one rural township in Myanmar (formerly known as Burma) build, manage and operate their own sustainable health center.

Our grand vision was, and still is, that there is a direct correlation between providing “care” through public health, education and economic development services to the underserved people of the world, and the “peace” desired by government and the people.

The Care for Peace mission got off to a great start five years ago when we selected a remote township to build our first solar-powered health center that now awaits telecom and televideo connectivity to medical facilities in Myanmar and the Center for Telehealth at the University of Virginia in the United States.

Our agreement with the Union government is that, once completed, the tele-connected health center will be replicated in at least 250 rural townships nationwide.

Until earlier this year, everything went along according to plan when it became apparent that our development mission needed to be set aside in favor of helping the government address the horrific Rohingya refugee crisis of some 1.2 million destitute refugees who are currently overflowing Myanmar into Bangladesh.

In 2012, we met with the newly-assigned U.S. Ambassador to Myanmar, the World Food Programme country director and resident representative, and the World Bank country manager, among others, all of whom were very positive about our desire to help build Myanmar’s health care infrastructure in the rural areas where both care and peace are needed most.

However, we were also apprised of the cold truth that Myanmar is a failed nation trying to struggle back into the family of nations after a half century under a brutal totalitarian regime not that different from the conditions in North Korea.

We knew what we were getting into.

Today, in much the same way the first responders attacked the recent Santa Rosa wildfires, many international non-government emergency response organizations, like the International Rescue Committee, are doing everything in their power to help deal with the overwhelming Rohingya humanitarian emergency.

My thought is that while the Myanmar government and their international advisers develop a long-range strategy for a peaceful solution to the problem, and while the emergency crews eventually wind down their life-saving activities, many small interdisciplinary “Care Teams” comprised of Myanmar citizens should be employed to begin working with Rohingya families for as long as it takes to ensure each Rohingya person is able to pursue the same opportunities as everyone else in a truly free democratic society.

If invited, Care for Peace is prepared to amend its long-term health center development mission, to continue working with our dear friends at all levels of government and field in Myanmar, and to help create, train and manage the care teams and their partner Rohingya families.

I wouldn’t be so optimistic during this dark time in Myanmar had I not come to the scene with a vision that “care for peace” is the antidote to “killing for peace” wherever human-inflicted pain and suffering occurs in the world.

Myanmar’s drive towards democratization could crumble under the weight of its Rohingya problems.

Even if that happens I truly believe that “care for peace” will long endure, even if Care for Peace does not.

Categories
Hospitals & Healthcare

Health care paves the way to peace

Friends, donors and potential donors alike have asked me to explain how Care for Peace, a Marin-based nonprofit, is able to continue building a prototype “Healthy Village” in rural Myanmar (Burma), while the publicized persecution of the Myanmar government towards a nationless minority of 1.1 million refugees must certainly be affecting our progress.

The current situation in Myanmar does not affect our progress.

Care for Peace is fortunate to have donors who understand the inseparable connection between care and peace. Providing care through public health, education and enterprise services to the underserved people of the world results in greater peace within and between nations.

Our Healthy Village project is not that much different from what many other non-government organizations are doing throughout Myanmar and the world to provide relief and development opportunities to people who live within or near conflicts, abject poverty or shifting political landscapes.

There is a great need for our Healthy Village project, since most in Myanmar are distressingly lacking even the most basic health care.

Of the 53 million people who live there, 35 million (67 percent) are impoverished villagers.

According to the United Nations ranking of health systems, life expectancy is low, ranking at 170 of 191 countries.

About 35 percent of children under the age of five have stunted growth.

Among developing nations, people in rural Myanmar are among the poorest, hungriest, least educated, and geographically isolated.

Care for Peace has already succeeded in bringing the Healthy Village concept to fruition. Thanks to the generosity of our board and advisors, The Porter Foundation and The Vimy Foundation, we are now serving rural villagers with our Mobile Health Van.

Happily, we have also built the prototype Healthy Village Rural Health Center that will be surrounded by schools, community and senior centers, housing, agriculture and aquaculture farms, stock animal ranches, and micro-economy businesses.

Myanmar is a “new country” that is only four years into emerging from a totalitarian military state to a democratic union.

Peace hangs in the balance. It is the resolve of Care for Peace to help tip the balance. It’s all in the name: “Care for Peace.”

To care with our hearts and provide care with our hands is what makes the process of attaining peace worthwhile.

It must be.

Florence Nightingale, Clara Barton, Mother Teresa, among other notable caregivers, will always be remembered for how they helped relieve pain and suffering, and helped bring peace to millions of sick, wounded and impoverished people.

Peace may be the highest achievement of the human spirit. The Nobel Peace Prize is the most respected award in the world bestowed on an individual or group for having actively initiated a process that promotes peace.

John Lennon’s timeless message “Give Peace a Chance” is the song of choice for war protestors. And “Rest in Peace” is our farewell wish for loved ones.

To care for peace is to accept the principle that a society that is dedicated to caring is the most rewarding path to lasting peace.

Upon completion of our first project, Care for Peace has agreed to facilitate the development of as many Healthy Villages throughout Myanmar as there are villages prepared to build their own sustainable care communities.

It all starts with one Healthy Village.

It takes a whole village to change the world.

Categories
Hospitals & Healthcare

The Origin of The C4P Non-Profit Organization

Compiled by Hla Kyi, Dr. Don Simborg, Dr. Patricia Salber, Dr. David Holbrooke, Kathryn Johnson, Carol Patterson, Hla Kyi and Jeff Hardy

 The political relationship between the United States and Myanmar worsened after the 1988 military coup and violent suppression of pro-democracy demonstrations.  However, following signs of liberalization, the US government began the process of improving its links with Myanmar in 2011.

 In February 2011, Tyler Darland, President of PMI International and Hla Kyi, Vice President of PMI International contacted Jeff Hardy requesting that he review the design of a hospital proposed to be built in Myanmar.  Jeff (founder and now President of C4P), is a 30-year veteran in healthcare systems, service and facility planning and design.  He facilitated innovative and widely publicized management operations and new-facility development services for over 120 hospitals all over the US.  Clients included Kaiser Permanente, Catholic Healthcare West, Columbia/HCA Healthcare, Adventist Healthcare Systems, Disney Celebration Health, et al.  Internationally, Jeff developed hospitals and healthcare systems for Kaiser Foundation International in the Bahamas, Bahrain, Curacao N.A., and the United Arab Republics, et al.    

Most recently,  Jeff led new facility development initiatives for the International Medical Center in Hanoi, Vietnam, the Women’s and Children’s Hospital in Port Harcourt, Nigeria, the Mobile Public Health Program in Delta State, Nigeria, and the Matibabu Hospital in Ukwala, Kenya.

After the United States formally eased sanctions on Myanmar with the three basic humanitarian assistances including Health Care support in July 2012, Mr. Tyler Darland and Mr. Hla Kyi went to Myanmar to give a message from Mr. Jeff to Myanmar President office about willing to support humanitarian Health Care, and then the President Office directed to Ministry of Health, as a result  the Deputy Minister and Officials met with Mr. Tyler and Mr. Hla Kyi, and then follow up meeting with Dr. Than Sein. Subsequent discussions with Jeff led to a visit to the US by Dr. Than Sein on behalf of the president of Myanmar to look at several US hospitals.

Tyler Darland, Hla Kyi, Jeff Hardy and Linda Tavasi, CEO of the Marin Community Clinic hosted the visit.  Based on this visit, the group decided to work together to help develop the Myanmar National Health System.  Dr. Sein went back to Myanmar and founded the People’s Health Foundation (PHF).  Jeff Hardy, with the guidance and support of the first C4P Board Chairman, Dr. David Holbrooke, founded C4P.  Tyler Darland and Hla Kyi joined the C4P administration and Linda Tavasi became a Board Member of C4P.

In August 2012, Jeff, Tyler Darland and Hla Kyi met with Dr. Sein and the Myanmar Minister of Health, the Hon. Pe Thet Khin, to draft a Cooperative Agreement between C4P, the PHF and the Ministry of Health to collaborate in developing the Myanmar National Health System.  The agreement was signed in October 2012.

Also in October 2012 the Myanmar Ministry of Health engaged Jeff and C4P to design one prototype “Mini-Medical Center (MMC)” in Rakhine State, Myanmar, that will exist as a showcase facility for considering potential implementation strategy for the next few MMCs to be built in Rakhine State.  While the long-range vision is to build 250 MMCs where they are needed most in rural Myanmar, prudence dictates next-step planning will need to be carefully organized to ensure sufficient time and attention is given to any village interested in the slow-but-steady process of development required for securing success…and avoiding failure.